Sample report — “ACME Financial” is a fictional institution; findings are illustrative

Quantum-readiness assessment · for financial institutions

KYBERMARK

Quantum Readiness Gap Snapshot

acme-financial.example · external TLS perimeter · scanned 2026-07-31 · report generated 21 August 2026

4
Observations
3
Quantum-vulnerable
No
Hybrid PQC key exchange

Scope of this snapshot. An external scan observes only your public TLS perimeter — typically a small fraction of an organisation's cryptographic footprint. Internal services, data at rest, PKI, and code-level cryptography are not visible from the outside and are not assessed here.

Findings

No post-quantum key exchange support quantum-vulnerable

Your TLS endpoints negotiate only classical key-exchange groups (elliptic-curve / finite-field Diffie-Hellman). Traffic recorded today can be decrypted once these algorithms are broken — the harvest-now-decrypt-later exposure that regulators now expect you to inventory and plan around.
probe group: X25519MLKEM768
classical groups: prime256v1, secp384r1, X25519

Key exchange without forward secrecy quantum-vulnerable

Cipher suites using static RSA or static Diffie-Hellman key exchange are accepted. A single compromised private key retroactively decrypts all recorded sessions — the worst harvest-now-decrypt-later profile an endpoint can have.
static kex suites: TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA, TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA, TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256, TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384

Certificate relies on a quantum-vulnerable signature algorithm quantum-vulnerable

Your certificate chain uses RSA/ECDSA signatures. Public web PKI does not yet issue post-quantum certificates, so this is a crypto-agility roadmap item rather than an immediate fix — but it belongs in your inventory and migration plan.
public key: {"size": 2048, "type": "RSA"}

Legacy TLS protocol versions accepted

The server still accepts protocol versions that current standards consider end-of-life. Beyond the direct weaknesses, this signals limited cryptographic agility — the capability regulators increasingly ask you to demonstrate.
protocols: TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1

Method

Protocol, cipher-suite, key-exchange-group and certificate data collected with sslyze 6.3.1 and cross-checked with testssl.sh. Post-quantum support probed with a live TLS 1.3 handshake restricted to the hybrid X25519MLKEM768 group (OpenSSL 3.6.2 7 Apr 2026). Findings marked “quantum-vulnerable” follow the CycloneDX 1.6 CBOM convention (nistQuantumSecurityLevel = 0).